Spirit Airlines CEO Downplays Survival Threat, But Flight Attendants Urged to Prepare For Worst
Spirit Airlines is trying to put on a brave face, but both its financial filings and internal communications reveal a far bleaker picture than the CEO is publicly admitting.
As Spirit Airlines CEO Downplays Dire Financial Situation, Flight Attendants Face Stark Warning
Yesterday, I shared about a concerning warning from Spirit Airlines in a government filing suggesting it might not last for another year. With the budget carrier hemorrhaging money, it is facing a much more difficult time renewing a contract with its credit card processor, which is fundamental to its business model.
In a memo shared by Kris Van Cleave, CEO Dave Davis suggested to employees that the dire warning was a legal requirement rather than a reality:
Yesterday, we filed our 10-Q, outlining our second quarter 2025 financial results. This filing generated media coverage and, naturally, a lot of questions.
Let me start by providing some context around what’s included in the report. The report uses the phrase “substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.” This is a phrase required by our outside auditors to convey that there is risk if we do not make changes. But, we are.
Since my arrival at the airline, the Senior Leadership Team and I have developed a plan that leans into Spirit’s strengths, while moving away from the elements of the business that no longer work. That includes strategically growing our network in stronger markets with more opportunities and making some difficult decisions like re-evaluating unprofitable routes. It also includes improvements to our revenue management system and the way we sell our products. By doing so, the team and I are confident that we can build a Spirit that will continue to provide consumers the unmatched value that they have come to expect for many years to come.
Spirit is a critical part of the U.S. aviation industry. We have saved consumers hundreds of millions of dollars, whether they fly with us or not. We remain hard at work on many initiatives to protect our unique franchise, our valued Team Members, our business partners and our Guests who place their trust in us every day.
There is little doubt in my mind that Davis is the right man for the role. Under his leadership, Spirit is doing all it can to improvise and adapt in light of the environment. By some metrics, it is working. Total revenue per passenger is up 7% over last year and revenue per available seat mile is up 10%, though that has come at the cost of Spirit shrinking its operation. Even so, Spirit lost $245 million last quarter on only $1 billion in revenue…that’s a horrible result in what is traditionally a strong quarter.
So while I appreciate Davis’ words, I’m not sure how effective placing band-aids on gunshot wounds will be…
…and neither are flight attendants.
Spirit Airlines Flight Attendants Warned By Union
A memo to flight attendants warns of grim prospects of survival:
We need to be direct. Spirit is in a fragile financial position, likely more so than at any point in the previous 24 months.
We urge you to take an honest look at your personal situation, examine all your options, and prepare for all possible scenarios. Use this time to assess your financial situation and begin strategizing how best to weather the financial impact that flying cutbacks may have on your household.
It’s excellent advice, as grim as it is. What more can be said? Flight attendants would be foolish not to prepare for the worst, even if a merger or other lifeline can be found.
CONCLUSION
Spirit CEO Dave Davis may be working hard to reassure employees and customers, but the airline’s own financial disclosures paint a far darker reality. Even with smart leadership and targeted adjustments to its network and revenue strategy, the numbers suggest that Spirit is running out of runway.
The harsh truth is that confidence is currency in the airline business. A filing that casts doubt on Spirit’s survival will spook investors, partners, and travelers alike, draining the very advance ticket sales the carrier desperately needs to stay afloat. If the perception takes hold that Spirit Airlines is circling the drain, no amount of optimistic memos will keep it from being pulled under.
American Airlines Tried To Dismiss a Flight Attendant’s Cataract Lawsuit – A Judge Just Said No
4th December 2025
Shutterstock
American Airlines has failed in its attempt to have a lawsuit brought by a veteran flight attendant who developed cataracts thrown out of court. The flight attendant claims the airline started to treat him as a liability after he disclosed his condition, despite the fact that he was scheduled to have corrective surgery.
After being dismissed for performance-related issues, the flight attendants filed a lawsuit against his long-time employer, accusing the Fort Worth-based carrier of disability and race discrimination.
In this article…
- Long-serving flight attendant develops cataracts
- American Airlines treats the flight attendant as a liability
- Flight attendant accuses AA of race and disability discrimination
- American Airlines fails to have case dismissed
- EEOC is also suing American Airlines over eyesight discrimination
- Bottom line
Long-serving flight attendant develops cataracts
56-year-old Melba Hudson had worked for American Airlines for over two decades, initially as a ticket agent, before becoming a flight attendant in 2000 based out of Chicago O’Hare.
All appeared to be well until Hudson developed cataracts just months after transferring to Philadelphia International Airport. The situation became so bad that Hudson struggled to see in direct sunlight, and on one occasion, he even had all the window shades pulled down after takeoff so that he could carry on performing his job.
Hudson sought treatment and was approved for surgery to treat the cataracts, but, in the meantime, he informed his supervisor that he was struggling to see well and only saw the outlines of figures if the sunlight shone through the windows of the plane in flight.
American Airlines treats the flight attendant as a liability
After disclosing his disability, Hudson claims American Airlines started to treat him unfavorably and started to ‘write him up’ for minor transgressions that younger and Caucasian coworkers were never pulled up for.
Hudson was accused of at least one operational delay, along with other minor performance violations that culminated in his termination on December 3.
The Association of Professional Flight Attendants (APFA) attempted to challenge his dismissal, but after exhausting the internal grievance procedure, Hudson was advised to lawyer up.
Flight attendant accuses AA of race and disability discrimination
After being given leave to sue by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), Hudson filed a lawsuit against American Airlines in a Chicago district court in July 2025.
Hudson accused American Airlines of disability discrimination because the way he was treated by the carrier changed after he disclosed his cataracts. He was also suing for race and age discrimination, along with retaliation, claiming that he was treated differently from other flight attendants who were younger.
Ideally, Hudson wants American Airlines to be compelled to rehire him at the exact same seniority he left at, along with back pay and punitive damages.
American Airlines fails to have case dismissed
A key part of Hudson’s lawsuit rests on his being able to use the Rehabilitation Act for his claims of disability discrimination and retaliation.
But the Rehabilitation Act can only be used if the employer receives federal funding. In this case, Hudson argues that American Airlines receives federal funding under the Essential Air Service program.
AA’s attorneys, however, tried to get Hudson’s disability claims thrown out on the grounds that he had failed to connect his employment with the Essential Air Service program.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Robert W. Gettleman rejected AA’s argument, concluding that at this point in the proceedings, Hudson had done enough simply by stating that American Airlines receives EAS funds.
American Airlines has, therefore, been given until December 29 to submit its formal answer to Hudson’s lawsuit.
EEOC is also suing American Airlines over eyesight discrimination
A couple of months ago, the EEOC revealed that it was taking American Airlines to court for allegedly discriminating against a reservations agent who tragically lost her eyesight.
The woman started working for AA in 2012, but her world was turned upside down when she suffered an injury that resulted in permanent cortical blindness.
Several months later, the woman was desperate to return to work despite her disability, and this might have been possible with the use of screen reader software.
American Airlines, however, was more than hesitant, telling the woman that it had never employed a fully blind person in one of its reservations centers before. So, it kept to woman on medical leave until she was eventually dismissed at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EEOC first attempted to each a conciliation agreement with American Airlines, but when that failed, it decided to sue the carrier on behalf of the woman for disability discrimination. This lawsuit is also still in progress.
Bottom line
It’s not uncommon for an airline to try to have a case dismissed at the earliest possible opportunity, so AA’s approach to this lawsuit isn’t necessarily unusual.
That being said, Judge Gettleman did indicate that going forward, Hudson might have to provide more evidence to link his employment to the EAS program if his disability discrimination claims are to survive
