‘Literally proposing The Purge’: Trump mocked online after his solution to crime is compared to horror movie
At a rally in Pennsylvania on Sunday the former president suggested that one way to decrease levels of criminal activity would be allowing police ‘one rough hour’
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarksClose popover
Sign up for the daily Inside Washington email for exclusive US coverage and analysis sent to your inbox
*SIGN UP
Donald Trump was mocked online after proposing a solution to crime that bore jarring similarity to horror movie franchise The Purge.
At a rally in Pennsylvania on Sunday the former president suggested that one way to decrease levels of criminal activity would be allowing police “one rough hour” to tackle the issue, during which time there would be less restraints.
“One rough hour and I mean real rough, the word will get out and it will end immediately,” Trump said.
Social media users were quick to point out that a world in which people are free to act without impunity for a short amount of time is the exact plot of The Purge. One user on X posted a reminder of the original 2013 film’s synopsis.
“In an America ravaged by crime and overcrowded prisons, the government sanctions an annual 12-hour period during which all criminal activity – including murder – is legal,” the synopsis reads.
“Trump is literally proposing The Purge lmao,” wrote one X user, with another suggesting that the former president had just watched the movies.
“The way he watched The Purge and sat there like you know what… we should try this,” they said.
“He’s just describing the premise of The Purge,” added conservative anti-Trump PAC The Lincoln Project, sharing a clip of Trump’s remarks.
Others pointed out that one of the movie’s multiple sequels came out in 2016 and was titled The Purge: Election Year – the same year that Trump was elected as president.
The film’s tagline – “Keep America Great” – received attention from the internet and media alike when it became the slogan used by Trump for his 2020 re-election campaign.
“The Purge: Election Year came out in 2016. Trump stole its motto in 2020 and its plot in 2024,” wrote a social media user.
In a statement shared with The Independent a Trump campaign spokesperson said: “President Trump has always been the law and order President and he continues to reiterate the importance of enforcing existing laws.
“Otherwise it’s all-out anarchy, which is what Kamala Harris has created in some of these communities across America, especially during her time as CA Attorney General when she emboldened criminals.”
Trump’s call for police to have a ‘Purge’-like day is an authoritarian strategy
This isn’t a joke — and it also isn’t about crime.
‘Desperate to get attention back on him’: Trump resorts to insane and dangerous attacks of VP HarrisSeptember 29, 2024 / 01:59
Oct. 1, 2024, 6:00 AM EDT
In the 2013 dystopian thriller “The Purge,” America observes a tradition wherein, once a year for a designated 12-hour period, all crime is permissible — up to and including murder. During the purge, society is rocked by spectacular violence, which is said to have a cathartic effect: It dramatically reduces crime and unemployment. “The Purge” provides audiences with a warning about the horrifying consequences of selective observation of morals and a world ruled by a “might makes right” ethos. But at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on Sunday, former President Donald Trump effectively floated the idea as a good thing. Except in his spinoff version, the twist is that it’s only the cops who get to do what they want.
Trump’s vision of “one rough hour” echoes his rhetoric about being “dictator for one day.”
As he often has in the past, Trump complained at the rally that police are “not allowed to do their job” because of political pressure and that crime is rampant in President Joe Biden’s America as a result. (It is not.) And that’s when he proposed his “Purge”-esque solution: If police were allowed “one real rough, nasty” and “violent day,” he said, crime would be eliminated “immediately.” He was taken enough by the proposition that he returned to it later, saying, “One rough hour — and I mean real rough — the word will get out and it will end immediately, you know? It will end immediately.”
A Trump campaign official told Politico afterward that he was “clearly just floating it in jest.” And Steven Cheung, the Trump campaign’s communications director, told Politico that Trump has “always been the law and order president and he continues to reiterate the importance of enforcing existing laws.”
Let’s unpack a few things here. The Trump campaign’s “in jest” excuse should be dismissed. As I’ve written before, for the better part of a decade Trump has used a comic tone and “I’m just kidding” caveats to float trial balloons for his most extreme ideas.Play
Trump: ‘One really violent day’ could fix shoplifting crime in citiesSeptember 29, 2024 / 01:59
Even though Trump obviously wouldn’t have the authority as president to permit the police to indulge in a day of extreme violence, that he’s articulating the idea in public at all is still significant — and corrosive. It signals an attitude toward police misconduct that helps to set the Republican agenda — at federal and state levels — on legislation related to police reform.
It could also affect the day-to-day culture of policing by emboldening police officers to act more aggressively when interacting with citizens. And it could more generally encourage Trump’s supporters to consider vigilantism and political violence as a way to address social problems. The latter is not a far-fetched, abstract concern, either, but a real, already-existing social phenomenon that could definitely get worse. In no context is it appropriate for a presidential candidate — much less a former or sitting president — to “joke” about law enforcement brutalizing the public, especially in a country plagued by police violence.
More from MS NOW Daily
Must reads from Today’s list
Byron Donalds faces racist attacks in Florida’s ugly GOP gubernatorial primary
Mike Johnson may have already lost
Cheung’s attempt to frame Trump’s authoritarian remarks as a reflection of his commitment to “law and order” is preposterous. Trump is suggesting that police should be able to operate outside the constraints of the law to achieve the social goal of reducing crime; in other words, suspending regular law to achieve order. And the worldview underpinning Trump’s preferred social order is, of course, reactionary — it’s about protecting the powerful and dominating those who challenge them.
The worldview underpinning Trump’s preferred social order is, of course, reactionary.
Trump’s vision of “one rough hour” echoes his rhetoric about being “dictator for one day” to crack down on illegal immigration and drill for oil wherever he wants. In both scenarios Trump invokes the threat of a crisis (surging crime or migration across the border) to legitimize the idea of extraordinary power (unconstrained executive power or police brutality) to achieve an end.
Trump tries to frame this as compatible with democracy and the rule of law by framing the exercise of that extraordinary power as temporary. This is, of course, a familiar playbook for autocratic leaders, who argue that crises require exceptions (ostensibly temporarily) to the rules to tackle them. But somehow the crises — and the special rules to solve them — seem to extend indefinitely. The reality is that rules are rules only because everyone follows them. Once you argue that you alone need an exception to the rule to govern, then you’re in effect arguing that you don’t believe in rules.
If Trump wins the White House again, would he be able to pursue a special police “purge”? Not through any conventional laws or institutions. But everything he’s said, especially since 2020, has made it clear that he’s interested in trying, and the courts and half of Congress seem willing to let him.
