Video shows robber casually strolled away after escaping 12-hour SWAT standoff, shop owner says

Police thought they had him cornered in a 7-Eleven, but he waited them out — and plundered the till at a nearby pizza shop before leaving, the owner said.

For more than 12 hours Tuesday, police thought they had an armed robber cornered at a 7-Eleven in the heart of downtown Long Beach. Cops on loudspeakers ordered him to come out. Officers lobbed tear gas. SWAT team members parked armored vehicles outside. Rifle-toting police even scaled the roof and scoured next-door businesses in case he’d managed to get through the ceiling or walls.

He eluded them all — and managed to come away a few hundred dollars richer, according to a nearby shop owner. Mike Rosetti, who runs Broadway Pizza, says he has security camera footage and an empty till to prove it.

Rosetti lost a full day of business as police staked out the corner at Pine Avenue and Broadway. His shop is two doors down from the 7-Eleven where police say a gunman showed up around 2 a.m., sending employees running out of the store to flag down nearby cops.

As the ensuing standoff dragged on, Rosetti wasn’t able to get back into his business until Tuesday afternoon. When he did, he said, it stank of tear gas. There was a broken ceiling tile — he presumed left by SWAT officers who’d searched inside — and dirty towels strewn on the ground.

He started cleaning up and didn’t think much more of it until Wednesday, when he entered his back office and saw papers oddly shuffled around. Minutes later, one of his employees told him there was no cash in the register.

That’s when Rosetti checked his security cameras and saw something he said was chilling.

about:blank

Around 5:30 p.m. Tuesday — after officers had given up the hunt — a man Rosetti assumes is the robber walked in through the rear door of Broadway Pizza. Rosetti had left it open, hoping to air out the tear gas smell. He’d unwittingly given the robber access to the restaurant from a rear stairwell that connects to a closed-down nightclub and shared storage space on the building’s second floor.

Rosetti is pretty sure the armed thief hid out in the stairwell and storage room for more than 12 hours while police searched the 7-Eleven, Broadway Pizza and the Pinkberry in between them.

Rosetti’s video showed the man was able to casually stroll into his pizza shop Tuesday evening, grab an employee’s backpack, fill it with cash and retreat to the stairwell — all while Rosetti and one of his workers were just a few feet away in another room.

Later that day, still unaware, Rosetti locked up the stairwell door. He thinks the armed man was hiding inside, just a few feet away. Rosetti said he isn’t sure where the robber went after he closed the door, but there’s an exit to the alleyway from the stairwell, making it trivially easy for him to sneak away once it got dark.

Rosetti doesn’t have cameras in the storage area, so he’s not positive how the man got there, but he’s got a pretty good idea.

Up until 2013, Rosetti also owned the nightclub above Broadway Pizza. He accessed both through the shared stairwell and storage room. If the robber pushed up one of the roof panels in the 7-Eleven, he would’ve been able to get into the Pinkberry next door, which also connects to the stairwell and storage area.

After watching the camera footage and realizing how much danger he’d been in, Rosetti said he couldn’t sleep Wednesday night.

“I told my girlfriend when I got home, that guy could have shot me,” he said.

It’s not clear if police ever tried to search the stairwell or storage area.

In a statement, the LBPD said it “is reviewing and analyzing the recent video to determine if the armed suspect was able to avoid being located during the extensive and systematic public safety search conducted by our department. While extremely rare, no search is 100% conclusive and there are instances in which suspects have been able to evade law enforcement either from a secure location within the search perimeter or by escaping from the perimeter at some point during the incident.”

“Our SWAT Detail is one of the best in our nation,” the statement continued.

Since the standoff, Mary Zendejas, the City Council member who represents the area, said she’s requested more police patrols in downtown.

Zendejas also wrote that she expects “a robust investigation” into what unfolded.

Editor’s note: This story was updated with a statement from the Long Beach Police Department.

Google is abruptly changing the game for journalism — again

By technology reporter James Purtill

• ABC Science
• Topic:AI

Fri 10 OctFriday 10 October

Link copiedShare article

This is an era of the “rug pull”, an age of the “pump and dump”.

The terms come from investment scams, but now apply more generally. A project is going well, prices are skyrocketing, attracting more investors: “the pump”.

Suddenly, it all comes crashing down. The rug is pulled and the founders vanish with the money. Investors are left with worthless assets: “the dump”.

After years of being courted by tech companies and encouraged to provide content optimised for their platforms and websites, news sites are increasingly finding themselves locked out and denied access to their users.What do Google AI summaries mean for the future of news?

One year on from the rollout of Google AI Overviews in Australia, exclusive data shows steep year-on-year declines in readership for the top news websites as smaller publishers warn of lay-offs.

This is sometimes presented as a media industry issue, as a story about news sites outflanked by changing technology.

But it’s about much more than that. News sites are the canaries in the coalmine.

This is about the biggest change to the web in 20 years, one that will affect how you access information and what you read and watch.

Most of us have grown up with the “open web” — the enormous global collection of websites where information and content are published and shared freely without requiring the approval of a hypothetical web-owner or third party.

It’s so commonplace it’s hard to imagine a future without it, and yet it’s under threat.

AI tools trained on the best websites of the open web are now killing traffic to these sites.

And despite changing the future of journalism and our access to an online public resource of information, the issue is getting little attention.

From search engine to answer engine

The two best examples of this trend are the choices made by Meta and Google to sideline news site content and referrals.

Just under a decade ago, Meta abruptly changed its algorithm to show less news content on the main feed, beginning a process that culminated a year ago, when it announced it no longer wanted any news content.

Now it looks like Google is doing something similar.

The facts are different, but the consequences for journalism are the same.

Google has built an AI model partly trained on news content (which it initially took for free, without asking) that’s able to answer many user queries and therefore avoid having to direct them to the sites themselves.

As a result, search traffic to news sites appears to be tanking.

This week, Google went one step further, rolling out the advanced search tool AI Mode to Australian users, which will further sideline news sites and embed the shift from “search engine” to “answer engine”.

Some publishers are discussing “Google Zero” — the hypothetical moment when Google Search stops sending any traffic to third-party websites, instead providing AI overviews directly on the search results page.

“I think it’s an absolutely pivotal, maybe the most pivotal moment for journalism ever,” Kevin Indig, a US-based search engine optimisation (SEO) expert, told me.

“A lot of publishers are asking themselves, what is our business model?”

“What is our model when AI answers so many questions?”

Newsrooms optimise for Google

It’s hard to overstate Google’s importance to online journalism.

Over the past two decades print readership declined, radio and TV audiences dwindled, and social media platforms became fickle.

Facebook turned away from news and the responsibility of moderation. Twitter got weird. YouTube was overrun with misinformation.

Through all this, Google was pretty solid. The essential utility for the web continued to direct billions of users to news sites, so ubiquitous it was almost invisible.

Optimising articles so they ranked higher in Google became second nature. News sites employed staff to spot search trends.

Google isn’t just another way of getting eyeballs on an article. Its search engine is baked into the concept of a news website.

And it goes further than this.

Given Google’s dominance of the search market, Google search is arguably central to the operation of the open web — of the hundreds of millions of publicly accessible websites that get most of their readers via Google.

A whole SEO industry exists on the basis that Google will continue to sift the web and publish search results leading users to the most relevant sites.

Another huge industry, content marketing, is based on the idea that publishing useful or generally interesting information on a topic will draw readers to a site, where they may then purchase a product or service.

As Indig put it, until recently, “every participant of the marketplace was winning.”

“Whether they’re journalists, or content marketers, or advertisers, or Google, they were all winning. It was a great deal.”

Then generative AI changed the game.

Analysis from the ABC’s experts

• “Whether or not Anthony Albanese believes a federal royal commission is necessary, or even the best use of resources, is now politically irrelevant. By author, Clare Armstrong.authorClare Armstrong
• “Albanese’s role has become that of the nation’s lightning rod as it works through the aftermath, recriminations and inevitable changes that people are demanding. By author, Jacob Greber.authorJacob Greber
• “Labor had a victory through the power of centrism defeating the left-wing greens leader Adam Bandt and then vanquishing Peter Dutton from the right. By author, Patricia Karvelas.authorPatricia Karvelas
• “Elderly Australians are waiting longer, paying more for aged care than ever before and getting fewer hours because of higher fees. By author, Anne Connolly.authorAnne Connolly
• “This was a humbled prime minister. Showing contrition, some regret, and an acknowledgement more could have been done. By author, David Speers.authorDavid Speers
• “The ‘pub test’ tends to be applied when we’ve run out of avenues to pursue a public figure, but are still super annoyed. By author, Annabel Crabb.authorAnnabel Crabb
• “Real progress will be measured by whether Jewish students still need armed guards as they progress through Australia’s education system. By author, Conor Duffy.authorConor Duffy
• “The shocking Bondi terror attack has dramatically shifted the political outlook for 2026. By author, Clare Armstrong.authorClare Armstrong
• “There are billions of reasons why the going is proving tough in negotiating a new funding deal for the nation’s public hospitals. By author, Stephanie Dalzell.authorStephanie Dalzell
• “Thanks to John Howard’s disastrous overreach with WorkChoices, industrial relations is scorched earth for the Liberals. By author, Michelle Grattan.authorMichelle Grattan
• “Millennials are acutely feeling the pressure of housing unaffordability, the cost of living, and the changing shape of the world. By author, Isabella Higgins.authorIsabella Higgins
• “The new environmental bill introduces a ‘restoration fund’ that has come under scrutiny for potentially, and perversely, allowing further destruction to habitats. By author, Peter de Kruijff.authorPeter de Kruijff

More Analysis

 

Has Google done a rug pull?

About a year ago Google rolled out generative AI answers, posted above the standard blue links, for some search queries.

Since then, news sites have reported steep declines in search traffic of 30 per cent. Some content marketers saw declines of 80 per cent.

There’s broadly two opposing arguments here. The first is that Google is giving users what they want — the internet changes and we all have to adapt. The second is that this is a rug pull.

According to the second argument, Google using AI to answer search queries isn’t just an evolution of search, but a betrayal of the basic quid pro quo.

The open web is based on the idea of a reciprocal and mutually beneficial relationship between publishers and search engines like Google.

But Google’s AI is trained on open web data, which includes news sites.

So Google is arguably using content from news sites that costs these newsrooms readers and advertising revenue. It’s gone from helpful partner to publishing rival.

Instead of Google sending readers to other sites, it’s pursuing a future where there’s only one big site: Google.How generative AI is impacting our readers’ everyday lives

Whether it’s increasing productivity at school and work or creating concerns for people’s job security, our readers share the ways generative AI is impacting their lives.

Now, maybe fears of “Google Zero” are an overreaction.

Google still sends billions of readers to news sites and says it is “committed to highlighting high-quality content on the web.”

Services like Google Discover remain an important source of traffic for news.

Google needs content from news sites to train its AI, so the AI can generate answers that are factual and up to date.

It also needs news sites to do well so it can make money from selling ads on these sites.

But then again, it’s early days. We’re only one year into the experiment.

There’s widespread speculation Google will make AI Mode (a chatbot-like generative AI search tool) the default for search, which would mean less traffic to news sites, and probably mass lay-offs and fewer publishers.

And what then?

The future of journalism could be pretty bleak if publishers were only being kept alive to train AI chatbots for a US tech company.

What can publishers do?

Publishers could demand licensing deals so that Google and others pay them for the content used to train AI models.

This is already happening. In August, Google signed a deal with Australian Associated Press to provide content for its AI platform.

But this approach has its drawbacks. Licensing deals favour big news sites. Smaller, independent publishers could miss out, as happened with the News Media Bargaining Code in 2021.

This inequality around licensing deals contributed to the net loss of about 166 news outlets in Australia over the past five years.Why the relationship between Facebook and Australian news is over

Enforcing the News Media Bargaining Code will make a bad situation worse without solving the problem of who will pay for the news.

Another option is regulators like the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission could demand AI companies fairly compensate publishers for content.

Regulating US tech giants is tricky. Meta pulled Australian news from Facebook and Google initially threatened to pull its search engine rather than pay publishers for content under the News Media Bargaining Code.

A third option is an automated system for paying content owners for their work.

In July, the online infrastructure company Cloudflare announced the trial of a service that allows content owners to charge AI crawlers for access.

So far, there’s no broad consensus about what works, Indig said.

In the meantime, across the open web, gates are going up. More publishers are using paywalls to make up for lost ad revenue.

“For a lot of publishers, gating wasn’t viable,” he said.

“Now it’s like they’re being pushed towards the cliff and gating is one of the best kinds of options that they have.”

Expect to see more gated content, fewer publishers, and perhaps fewer articles overall.

From now on, you may see fewer explainers, how-to guides, or other content that’s generally more easily summarised by AI.

After this rug pull, the web is going to be less open.